<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>GuitarToyBox - Latest Comments in Gibson Robot</title><link>http://guitartoybox.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://guitartoybox.disqus.com/gibson_robot_96/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:29:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Gibson Robot</title><link>http://guitartoybox.com/2007-11-11/gibson-robot/#comment-1590389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's just Gibson being Gibson. My guess is that there is an issue using the name "Powertune". Maybe the licensing agreement has been changed or something like that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wookie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:29:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gibson Robot</title><link>http://guitartoybox.com/2007-11-11/gibson-robot/#comment-1590388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't realise this isn't the guitar that was released earlier this year, according to &lt;a href="http://MusicGadgets.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="MusicGadgets.net"&gt;MusicGadgets.net&lt;/a&gt; that was the Les Paul powertune!? Now I'm confused...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.musicgadgets.net/2007/11/10/gibson-robot-guitar/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.musicgadgets.net/2007/11/10/gibson-robot-guitar/"&gt;http://www.musicgadgets.net...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Bloomer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 05:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>